Shafaq News/ The Iraqia List confirmed ,that  the recent  "conflict" between the coalition of Kurdish blocs and Law State was to achieve political gains, pointing at the same time that its future alliances will be with parties that are compatible with its political project.
"The recent conflict between the Kurdistan Alliance bloc and the Law State  comes in the context of getting political gains." The MP for the Iraqia List, Nahidah Daini told" Shafaq News"
It is said that the coalition of Kurdish blocs counted what they called the "dictatorial" approach of the government as an escalation against most of the political blocs, noting that the federal government's convulsive position toward the controversial issues with the region is not new. It is a continuation of the disavowal of all agreements.
"The difference of  the Iraqia List, with the Law State is much more than that . It is  about the national project that the Iraqia parties adheres to.", said Daini .
The differences between the coalition of Law State and the Iraqia List, continued  on the vote on the bill of the National Council of the strategic policies. The  first confirmed that this project can not be passed in its current form while the second  counted the  position of the Law State is not effective on the enactment of a special council. The Kurds have linked between the continuation of confidence among the political blocs and the adoption of  the law.
The coalition of law state, led by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki,rejected  the earlier request of the President of the Kurdistan Region Massoud Barzani, to withdraw the draft law of oil and gas presented by the Government to the Parliament recently, counting that his goal behind his statements is "exporting the internal crisis" in the region.
The presidency of the Kurdistan region of Iraq accused earlier the  Iraqi the government headed by the Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, of disregarding the political agreements to impose a form of centralism and to fix the dictatorship of the resolution, calling them to withdraw the draft law of oil and gas, because it disagrees with the content of the Constitution and the legal course of the Council of Ministers until it is reviewed.